Rigorous Double-Blind Review
Khoinchha upholds the highest standards of academic integrity. Every submission is subjected to a fair, impartial evaluation by expert reviewers while concealing both author and reviewer identities.
Our Commitment to Rigorous Review
Every manuscript submitted to our biannual journal—published in June and December—is evaluated by field experts. By concealing author and reviewer identities throughout the process, we ensure unbiased assessments, fostering trust and maintaining the quality of research disseminated across humanities, social sciences, arts, and beyond.
Evaluation Criteria
Originality
Does the manuscript present new and significant findings that contribute to the existing body of knowledge?
Methodology
Is the research methodology sound and appropriate for the research question? Are the methods described clearly and transparently?
Data Analysis
Is the data analysis rigorous and appropriate? Are the results presented clearly and accurately?
Interpretation
Are the results interpreted correctly and discussed in the context of existing literature?
Clarity and Concision
Is the manuscript well-written, organized, and free of grammatical errors?
Significance
Does the research have the potential to impact the field and inform future research?
Steps Involved
Initial Assessment
The editorial team conducts a preliminary evaluation of all submissions to verify adherence to journal guidelines.
Reviewer Selection
Manuscripts are assigned to reviewers with expertise in the subject matter.
Blind Review
Reviewers provide detailed assessments of the manuscript, including its strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for improvement. Importantly, the author identities remain concealed from the reviewers throughout the process.
Editorial Decision
The editor carefully considers the reviewers' feedback and makes a final decision. The decision can be: Accept (without revisions), Minor Revisions (pending minor updates), Major Revisions (invited for substantial updates and resubmission), or Reject.
Author Response
If the manuscript is accepted with revisions, the authors are invited to respond to the reviewers' comments and revise their manuscript accordingly.
Final Decision
The editor reviews the revised manuscript and makes a final decision about its publication.
Review Timeline
The peer-review process typically takes 16 to 20 weeks. However, the actual timeframe may vary depending on the availability of reviewers and the complexity of the manuscript. Delays are managed transparently with authors informed accordingly.
Transparency & COPE
Aligned with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, authors receive detailed feedback and editorial decision letters. Reviewers flag ethical concerns (such as plagiarism or data fabrication), which are investigated according to strict COPE protocols.
Why It Matters
Peer review is the foundation of Khoinchha’s quality assurance. By combining expert evaluation with ethical oversight, we maintain the journal’s reputation and support our no-fee, open-access mission. Authors gain constructive insights, reviewers contribute to scholarly standards, and readers access reliable research.